Description:

Despite many decades of research involving both human subjects and model systems, the underlying pathophysiology of long-term complications in classic galactosemia (CG) remains poorly understood. In this review, intended for those already familiar with galactosemia, we focus on the big questions relating to outcomes, mechanism, and markers, drawing on relevant literature where available, attempting to navigate inconsistencies where they appear, and acknowledging gaps in knowledge where they persist.  Classic galactosemia is an inborn error of metabolism caused by deleterious mutations on the GALT gene, which encodes the Leloir pathway enzyme galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase. Previous studies have shown that the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response (UPR) is relevant to galactosemia, but the molecular mechanism behind the endoplasmic reticulum stress that triggers this response remains elusive. In the present work, we show that the activation of the UPR in yeast models of galactosemia does not depend on the binding of unfolded proteins to the ER stress sensor protein Ire1p since the protein domain responsible for unfolded protein binding to Ire1p is not necessary for UPR activation. Interestingly, myriocin – an inhibitor of the de novo sphingolipid synthesis pathway – inhibits UPR activation and causes galactosemia hypersensitivity in these models, indicating that myriocin-mediated sphingolipid depletion impairs yeast adaptation to galactose toxicity. Supporting the interpretation that the effects observed after myriocin treatment were due to a reduction in sphingolipid levels, the addition of phytosphingosine to the culture medium reverses all myriocin effects tested. Surprisingly, constitutively active UPR signalling did not prevent myriocin-induced galactose hypersensitivity suggesting multiple roles for sphingolipids in the adaptation of yeast cells to galactose toxicity. Therefore, we conclude that sphingolipid homeostasis has an important role in UPR activation and cellular adaptation in yeast models of galactosemia, highlighting the possible role of lipid metabolism in the pathophysiology of this disease.

Duarte galactosemia is not classic galactosemia, but rather an example of biochemical variant galactosemia that results in approximately 25% residual activity of galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (GALT) enzyme. In contrast, classic galactosemia is associated with complete or near complete absence of GALT activity. While infants with classic galactosemia are placed on galactose-restricted diets to prevent the acute and long-term manifestations of their metabolic disorder, while individuals with Duarte variant galactosemia (Duarte-2 galactosemia) do not require diet therapy. The long-term complications that are seen in classic galactosemia such as cerebellar ataxia, and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism do not occur in Duarte-2 galactosemia. While Duarte galactosemia does not appear to be a metabolic disease, it may have an impact on early neurodevelopmental outcomes. This study examined developmental outcomes and the need for special services in individuals with Duarte-2 galactosemia in comparison to individuals with classic galactosemia. We performed a medical record review of individuals with GALT deficiency that were evaluated at Boston Children's Hospital and enrolled in our study of outcomes in galactosemia. This included 95 participants, 21 with Duarte-2 galactosemia and 73 with classic galactosemia. Duarte-2 participants had developmental test scores within the average range. However, 42% of subjects with Duarte-2 galactosemia had participated in early intervention and/or special education and 32% received speech therapy. Their pattern of strengths and weaknesses in cognitive/language/motor domains was similar to that noted in participants with classic galactosemia, albeit to a milder degree. The data indicate that in children with Duarte-2 variant galactosemia, the cognitive/language and motor skills were within normal limits with their cognitive/language skills developing earlier than their motor skills during their first year of life. A history of diet treatment was not related to the use of special services. These results suggest that Duarte-2 galactosemia increases the risk for early mild developmental delays irrespective of treatment history, which resolves over time, and highlights the need to further assess neurodevelopment in early infancy, in Duarte-2 galactosemia. As Duarte-2 galactosemia is not a bona fide biochemical genetic disease, we hypothesize that elements in the genomic space that include the GALT gene are responsible for a transient delay in language-related motor skills during early infancy.

With Regards

Mary Smith
Journal Coordinator
Global Journal of Research and Review