This Study Describes the Risk Factors for and Prevention of Tobacco use Among Young People

. Description:
This study describes the risk factors for and prevention of tobacco use among young people. Risk factors show differential importance along the course of tobacco use development. The contents of an effective prevention effort vary as a function of the age of target group. However, the mediation of the effects of effective programs is not well known. Various modalities of implementation of prevention programming may be important, though a majority of program evaluation has occurred in the school context. The majority of well-evaluated tobacco use prevention programs that employ a comprehensive social influences model show effects over an average of 6 years post-programming
Conversational and refusal assertion skills of 768 seventh grade youth were assessed through ratings of global (for example, effectiveness) and non-verbal (for example, eye contact) behaviour performed in two role-play scenarios. The ratings were completed after each scenario by the subjects themselves, as well as by classmate and trained adult observers. Use of the Hays and Hayashi multitrait scaling method to interpret these data revealed two results. First, the items used to measure role-play behaviour did not achieve sufficient internal consistency to create global and non-verbal composites. Second, inter-rater agreement and discriminant validity were obtained only for ratings of the global effectiveness of each of the two social skills. Next, a series of multiple regression analyses indicated that an index of the global effectiveness of refusal assertion skill, but not of conversational skill, was predictive of intention to use tobacco. Those who were relatively unskilful at refusing offers were more likely to intend to use tobacco. Analyses exploring relations of trained observer ratings of the effectiveness of both role-play types, trained observer ratings of the other global and non-verbal items, and subjects' intention to use tobacco indicated that only a hesitant voice pattern was both negatively predictive of effective refusal assertion and positively predictive of intention to use tobacco in the future. In other words, those who are hesitant when they refuse a tobacco offer are the ones most likely to report an intention to use tobacco in the future. The consistency of this last finding in the tobacco use prevention literature is discussed.
SMILES PLUS was the first study to extend the clinician-delivered logic model to prevention of tobacco use among adolescents. This multi-site trial with 154 participating offices, based on social learning theory and a behavioral ecological model, was designed to test whether orthodontists can prevent preteens from initiating smoking. The study found that orthodontists do not automatically adhere to anti-tobacco prevention services. Social learning variables can enhance both adherence to counseling guidelines and content of counseling to increase prevention effects. Providing financial incentives, tracking prescriptions, prompting positive feedback from patients, and adopting anti-tobacco counseling models in the office are likely to enhance anti-tobacco preventive services. Training orthodontists to be comfortable when advising nonsmoking youth not to start and to use social consequences to justify youth avoidance of tobacco might increase adherence to protocols and make their counseling more powerful. Adolescent smokers prior to intervention were more likely to start other risky behaviors later. Preventing tobacco use may halt additional risk behaviors and thereby reduce morbidity/mortality even more than expected from tobacco control alone. New and refined clinical trials should be conducted to determine the most effective interventions for adolescent tobacco control by clinicians.
With Regards
Joan
Journal Coordinator
Global Journal of Research and Review